accessibility tools
Post Type

KQED: Clipper 2.0 Leaves AC Transit Cash Riders Behind

December 19, 2025— KQED reporter Azul Dahlstrom-Eckman examines how the Bay Area’s new Clipper 2.0 upgrades are creating a widening equity gap for the 51% of AC Transit riders who pay with cash.

The story centers on riders like Silvia Matias, a 23-year-old single mother who spends $45 a week on AC Transit—$7.50 more than she would pay if she used a Clipper card. While the December 10 rollout of Clipper 2.0 brought welcome improvements like weekly fare caps and free transfers, these benefits are only available to riders with Clipper cards or contactless bank cards.

Laurel Paget-Seekins, senior transportation policy advocate at Public Advocates, told KQED that low-income riders and residents of historically marginalized communities face numerous barriers to using Clipper, from lack of reload stations in neighborhoods like deep East Oakland to the requirement to pre-load funds on cards.

“The system doesn’t work for people who are low income and unbanked and live in neighborhoods that don’t have access to reload their card,” Paget-Seekins said.

AC Transit board member Sarah Syed has introduced an agenda planning request calling for fare policy reform. Public Advocates is urging AC Transit to equalize cash and Clipper fares and create a way for cash users to purchase weekly passes—ensuring that transit improvements benefit all riders, not just those with access to banking services.

Read the story

Related Posts

Politico California Currents: Transit Is Running Out of Track

California transit agencies are sliding toward a fiscal cliff—and the budget isn't helping. Senior Transportation Policy Advocate Laurel Paget-Seekins explains why funding stability isn't optional.

Read more

Press Release: U.S. Department of Transportation Stops Asking Who Gets Left Behind

The Trump administration has eliminated disparate impact protections under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act—stripping the federal requirement that transit agencies consider whether their decisions disproportionately harm communities of color and low-income riders. Public Advocates Senior Transportation Policy Advocate Laurel Paget-Seekins calls it "a major rollback of civil rights protections" and is calling on California to fill the gap.

Read more

Talking Headways: Why Civil Rights Enforcement in Transportation Matters

What happens when the federal government stops enforcing civil rights in transportation? Senior Advocate Laurel Paget-Seekins joined the Talking Headways podcast to explain what's at stake—and what California can do about it.

Read more